Using the Virtual Training Suite in taught courses and building in group work activities

A case study from Sheffield College that might be adapted for use by others using the Virtual Training Suite in their taught courses, looking for ideas for group work to build around this resource to enhance learning.

Institutional setting: a case study written by Julia Duggleby, Online Learning Manager for the Sheffield College, and Course Leader for the LeTTOL (Learning to Teach Online) course.

Purpose of the case study: The case study offers a number of ideas for group tasks based on the Virtual Training Suite, which were developed by students on the LETTOL course. These tasks might easily be adapted by others for use in their own courses.

Why did we use the VTS? The LETTOL students were studying collaborative working and group work online. We chose to base the activity on the VTS suite because it would allow learners to use an existing resource to develop activities that were specific to their own subject field, but at the same time there would be a large degree of similarity about the resource they were using. We regard VTS as a very good resource and wanted to introduce our learners to it as a model of good practice, and one which they could use with their own learners online or face-to-face

How did we use the VTS? Students were set an assignment which asked them to develop three collaborative and/or cooperative activities which would enhance a tutorial from the Virtual Training Suite. A number of their ideas are outlined in this, the main part of the case study.

Conclusion and recommendations Some student feedback on building group work around this resource is given.

Institutional setting

The LeTTOL (Learning to Teach Online) course was developed in 1996 by a collaboration of the eight further education colleges in South Yorkshire. This entity is known as SYFEC (South Yorkshire Further Education Consortium) and the Sheffield College is a partner. The course was developed in response to the perceived need to provide further education lecturers in South Yorkshire with the pedagogical skills and knowledge to develop, deliver and manage online courses. At that time European funding was enabling an improving technological infrastructure in South Yorkshire and it was thought necessary to provide opportunities to develop the expertise necessary to exploit these technologies.

Since the pilot in 1996 the course has been continuously improved and updated, and its initially narrow target group has expanded. The course has been delivered now to more than 1500 learners, from all over the world. In addition a "sister" course targeted at corporate trainers, COL (Certificate in Online Learning) has been developed in partnership with the CIPD, (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development), as well as progression courses ITOL (Implementing Teaching Online) and ACOL (Advanced Certificate in Online Learning).

The focus of this case study is on a single assignment within the LeTTOL course, and it is helpful to this case study to give an overview of what the LeTTOL course is about in order to contextualised the assignment. LeTTOL is delivered entirely online, and its main learning objectives are to teach participants to:

  1. be competent in the use of technology necessary for successful online teaching
  2. understand the necessity of, and demonstrate, good organisational skills in using ICTs
  3. understand the issues of, and be able to demonstrate the skills needed to facilitate, collaborative working/groupwork online
  4. recognise how generic tutoring skills translate to an online environment
  5. identify and apply the skills needed to assist individual learners
  6. understand the principles of designing activities and courses for online delivery
  7. deploy available technology creatively and appropriately
  8. identify the impact that society may have on online learning

The course runs four times a year, with starts in February, June, September and November. The course duration is approximately twenty-three weeks, and learners are expected to study for six to seven hours per week for the whole of this time. Learners go through the course in groups of fifteen to twenty, with each group allocated to a single tutor. There is not complete flexibility in the pace of the course, in that learners are expected to meet deadlines, in order that they work through the course at more or less the same rate. This is because of the extreme importance that is placed upon the learners working in collaborative learning sets throughout the course. A learning set is a subset of a group, consisting typically of five to seven people. During the course learners are expected to complete approximately thirty assessed activities, about half of which are individual activities, and about half are collaborative. In addition learners are expected to circulate almost every individual activity to their learning set colleagues.

The course is divided into four Units, as follows:

Unit 1:Orientation
  • Preparation for LeTTOL to ensure maximum benefit is gained from online study
  • Skills of locating and sharing web-based information
  • Introduction to conferencing tool and collaborative work within learning sets
Unit 2:Learning Online
  • Educational and training impact of the Internet, and comparison between online delivery and other delivery media
  • Skills of evaluating web resources and how to deploy them for learning
Unit 3:Learning Management Issues
  • Role of the online tutor in the guidance and support of on-line learners· Management of online groups
  • Potential and challenges of assessment in an online course
Unit 4:Online Design and Delivery
  • Online learning in a wider context and in a changing world
  • Designing learning for the web. Integrating the skills and understanding acquired throughout the course, and applying them in the design of an on-line course outline

This case study focuses on one particular assignment in the LeTTOL course, which appears in Unit 4, as part of a section addressing the core principles of designing learning for the web. The activity was introduced for the first time in September 2002:

LETTOL Activity

Purpose of the case study

This case study should be of interest to anyone designing courses and who plans to incorporate some sort of group work. Though the LeTTOL assignment addresses online courses, the examples that are examined could be adapted for face-to-face delivery. The case study will therefore provide ideas for anyone who wishes to use the Virtual Training Suite tutorials as a basis for some sort of group learning activity, either a cooperative activity or a collaborative activity. It is a central philosophy of the LeTTOL way of working that there are major benefits in encouraging learners to work in groups in online courses, and in incorporating learning activities that require group work. Such interactions increase a sense of belonging and learners are more likely to stay motivated and committed, and to complete the course. Online group work also allows learners from different backgrounds, geographical locations and cultures to interact and to share their knowledge, experience and perceptions. In addition learners who are unable to attend face-to-face classes, perhaps because they have restricted mobility or caring responsibilities, can have access to collaborative and interactive learning that isn't easily available to them via traditional distance education.

Categories of online group interactions:

It may be useful to identify how I use the terms to describe different categories of learning group interactions.

Social/Group Building:

In most face-to-face situations when individuals come together to form a task group it is normal for some social interactions to take place. At the very minimum there will be an exchange of names, perhaps some exchange of personal information and some general remarks. There will also be an exchange of social non-verbal signals (such as smiles and nods). However online this process almost certainly needs to be built in explicitly, perhaps with the use of icebreakers and an active encouragement to give one another support and advice, and to continue interacting socially. This process is needed to build group coherence and identity in order to facilitate online learning activities.

Cooperative:

At a simple level learners can be encouraged to exchange ideas and experiences relevant to the learning, and to discuss topics which enlarge and develop the core course materials. However, integrated online communications can do much more than that. Learners may work together cooperatively. They may produce individual work and pass this work round for others to read and learn from, perhaps even receive feedback about. They could each produce a piece of work that contributes to some sort of shared outcome. Each individual's learning is increased because s/he has had access to the ideas, knowledge and experience of others.

Collaborative:

Learners can also be expected to work together collaboratively. They could be given a project or assignment and decide for themselves how the project is to be tackled, negotiating and allocating tasks and agreeing a timetable for achievement. They plan and work together to achieve an outcome. At an advanced level they could reflect not only on the outcome, but also on the group processes.

Why did we use the VTS?

In September 2002 the LeTTOL course, which is accredited by the Open College Network had its credit value increased from four to six level three credits, and additional learning outcomes and assessment criteria were developed. To ensure that these new learning outcomes were met some additional content and assignments needed to be added to the course. More web-based content was included about the pedagogy of online course design as well as the assignment that is the focus of this case study. The new assignment provided an opportunity for our learners to evidence several of LeTTOL's learning objectives, in particular:

We chose to base the activity on the VTS suite because it would allow learners to use an existing resource to develop activities that were specific to their own subject field, but at the same time there would be a large degree of similarity about the resource they were using. One reason for this was because we felt that this was fairer to the learners. Another reason was that if we allowed learners free choice of web-based resource on which to base activities, LeTTOL tutor workload would be greatly increased since it would be necessary for tutors to gain some familiarity with too many different websites in order to give constructive feedback on the designed activities. The VTS suite therefore gave flexibility and relevance to our learners, without overburdening the tutors with background reviewing of many websites. A further reason for choosing the VTS was that we regard it as a very good resource and we wanted to introduce our learners to it as a model of good practice, and one which they could use with their own learners online or face-to-face.

How did we use VTS?

We introduced the following assignment:

LETTOL Assignment

In fact this is an assignment that I would categorise as an individual/cooperative activity. The assignment itself requires the learner to work on his/her own, but there is the opportunity to learn from the ideas of others since the assignment is shared with the rest of the group.

Now this case study will describe some of the activities that just one cohort of LeTTOL learners suggested could enhance the VTS by adding cooperation and/or collaboration. There are two interrelated and overlapping perspectives which could be used to describe the activities. One perspective is to look at what learning outcomes the activities were designed to achieve. The other is to consider how the VTS's structure and content inspired the activity design.

Looking at learning outcomes:

The activities produced by LeTTOL learners seemed to fall into two main categories of learning outcomes

Process oriented, for example:

Content oriented, for example:

Many of the activities combined several of the above, for example this activity, which is based on the Tour section of the Nursing, Midwifery And Health Visiting tutorial:

Each member of the learning set could be asked to investigate 2 to 3 of the websites in the Links Basket for the facilities/resources that are available. They could then write a report of what they have found and send this to each other. The report is to include an evaluation on whether that site can support their teaching, learning or research. Although working individually, they would be collaborating in that they are sharing the information.

Had these learning outcomes:

  1. Distinguish the different types of resources available over the Internet
  2. Identify some of the key Internet resources for nurses, midwives and health visitors.
  3. Start collecting a list of Internet sites that can support your study, teaching or research

Thus the first learning outcome is process oriented, and the later two content oriented. In fact the activity descriptor itself shows that yet more skills are being developed, for example report writing and resource evaluation.

Another learner looked at how the Mathematician tutorial could be used by teachers of mathematics. Here is an activity that has a content-oriented learning outcome:

An activity could be to compile a lesson plan for a self contained resource comprising an introduction, further exploration and advanced units, including a list of terms and assessments for each part, for a given Maths topic.

It was suggested that the lesson plans could form part of a teaching resource pack available to all the mathematics teachers in this LeTTOL learner's college.

Another LeTTOL learner's starting point was an essay title "To what extent does Caryl Churchill's Top Girls reflect the economic, social and political tensions of England in the 1980s?" and the group activity, in several parts, required learners to work together to identify web resources, evaluate search tools, and improve searching skills:

1. Email the two other members of your assigned group. You will each have to evaluate one of the search tools listed below. Agree on who evaluates which tool.

2. Use your chosen search tool to find 5 web sources that are relevant to the above essay title.

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.  

3. Now evaluate your search tool by identifying its strengths and weaknesses

4. Use the conference facility to report your findings back to the group. Compare your findings and agree on which was the most effective search tool for finding relevant sources for the essay title.

5. Now work together to produce a list of 5 top tips on how to search successfully on the Internet.

This activity is designed to build online groupworking skills, using computer conferencing:

Between three to six learners can discuss a particular topic, for example, 'The benefits of an ICT Online Tutorial based on internet information', which would possibly be guided by an online Instructor. As in LeTTOL it could involve a team contributing their ideas, followed by a leader to collate the information into a summarised form, to be pasted in the particular conference for the rest of the team to see.

Looking at structure and content:

Most of the LeTTOL learners were new to the Virtual Training Suite, and clearly liked the content and structure. Thus often they would produce an activity based specifically on one tutorial of the VTS, or produce a sequence of activities that reflected the sequencing of VTS tutorials. For example this activity is based on the Women's Studies Tour tutorial:

On this section I would suggest that after doing it they picked the most useful Internet resource site for their subject and said why in no more than 250 words to their learning set. This would be in a conference/forum area for discussion. If they were all doing the same subject e.g. Women's studies then it would be worth having a group leader summarise the discussion. If not then the tutor could summarise.

This activity is based on the Social Worker Review tutorial:

This activity is designed to develop a critical view of websites. This time students will be asked to read the REVIEW section of Internet social worker and in their reporting back to say why they consider the site a reliable source of information. These reasons could then be collated to form a list of evaluative criteria to reinforce tutorial. The final quiz could be a useful rounding up activity, which could be fun if it was carried out in an IBL group rather than online - with a small prize perhaps!

And this activity moves from the Instructor Tour tutorial to the Discover tutorial:

There are several resource types in the 'Tour' section. Agree within the group who is taking each resource type. Depending on interest and group size there may be more than one person per resource type. Take one site from the tutorial (if more than one student per resource type then those students to agree who looks at what, hopefully avoiding duplication!) and one of student's own choice (using one or more of the resource types in the 'Discover' section to make their selection), choice may be connected with their subject interest but does not have to be. Report to group on - "Who/Where/Why/When/What" or PROMPT (if introduced in prior discussion) evaluation of both sites which resource(s) from the Discover section had been used, the search terms used to find own choice site, and any problems experienced. Depending on time, and other factors, discuss aspects of the sites chosen for the reports.

[PROMPT is an evaluation scheme, used in the OU short course (U120 - MOSAIC: Making Sense of Information in the Connected Age) In summary it is:- Presentation: Use of language, style, layout. Relevance: Is the information relevant geographically, is the emphasis correct, is the level of information what you desire? Objectivity: Are the authors likely to be objective? Do they have a balanced perspective, use emotive language, have biased opinions or financial backing of an interested party? Method: If it is a research paper, is the research laid out clearly, were appropriate methods used? Provenance: Can the source be traced? Are the authors or organisations involved named? Timeliness: Is the information dated clearly and is that date applicable to your needs or might the information already have become obsolete?]

The Internet Mathematician Glossary inspired one activity:

A glossary is a collection of terms used within the discipline. Although the terms used in mathematics do not change or increase that much, it would take a long time for one person to collect all the relevant ones together and define them adequately. Although the actual process may be simple for a seasoned mathematician, it would be a lot better if each member of the team could contribute a few to the project. Also this section of the learning resource may keep increasing as more and more terms are either invented or uncovered. The person who finds them can contribute them to the existing set. An activity could be for each group member to contribute five terms used in an allocated topic of maths.

And the Internet Instructor scenarios inspired another:

Post the outline of another 'Scenario'. Each pair to "fill in the gaps" i.e. to find relevant sites/pages and to complete the scenario with their suggestions, and to list points to complete "has used the Internet for". Each pair exchanges their scenario with another pair, and evaluates and gives feedback. Guidelines for feedback would be given, but would include asking them to use the "Who/Where/Why/When/What" points from the Review section and/or PROMPT. In an ideal world each pair to then put up their scenario and their evaluation of another scenario as a web page resource for the entire group, but this would be dependent on what technology was being used/access to shared web area and a host of other things!

Conclusion and Recommendations

Most of the LeTTOL learners regarded the VTS and the assignment based on it as useful. A few were already using the VTS with learners, and several said they intended to use it in future. A minority were somewhat critical of the tutorials, regarding them as being too reliant on text. Others suggested that since the VTS was designed for the individual user, the LeTTOL assignment was difficult for them as it was a struggle to add meaningful cooperative/collaborative activities.

As part of the LeTTOL course we ask learners to evaluate each assignment, and here are some of the comments made:

"I really enjoyed this activity; it felt as though I was getting to the point at which I could start to do the real thing."


"I was familiar with the Virtual Training Suite and its objectives, as I had had a workshop on it. I found this exercise useful but felt that it did not make a case fully for collaboration."


"Valuable for thinking about how to engage learners with material to assist with learning for it to have a better chance of being internalised - there is a high chance that material without activities will be skimmed over only."


Adding collaboration was a timely activity for me. I have been recommending the site to my students since it became available and knew I need to incorporate using it into the curriculum. A new professional regulation requiring social workers to acquire the ECDL has added impetus to this process.

In addition the LeTTOL tutors continuously review all the content and assignments of the course, and often discuss in some detail the success of a new assignment. On the whole tutors felt that this assignment generally served the needs of the learners in meeting LeTTOL's learning outcomes, though some tutors expressed concern about the way some learners tackled the assignment, feeling that sometimes the activities produced were too vague. We discussed rewording the activity or basing the activity on a different website. However we concluded that it was probably wise to leave the assignment as it was for a couple of runs of the LeTTOL course and review it in the light of experience and in the context of the whole course.

The response of LeTTOL tutors and learners was generally positive to the potential of the VTS for cooperative and collaborative learning.


Acknowledgments

Extracts were taken from activities designed by the following LeTTOL learners, and are quoted with their permission: Elizabeth Adebayo, Gerard Clough, Theresa Daly, Asher Mupasi, CC Stuart, Stella Page, Mary Watkins.